Analysis of Steam Piping Working at Temperatures Above Creep Zone

Problem Definition

According to API579-1/ASME FFS-1 Section 10.5.2., the following analysis procedure can be used to evaluate a component operating in the creep range using the results from a stress analysis. The assessment is based on the stresses and strains at a point and through the wall thickness in the component, and the associated operating time and temperature.

Methodology

Procedure for creep life assessment

(according to API579-1/ASME FFS-1 rules)

1. Damage characterization. Evaluation of operating condition:

  • Operating conditions: according to CAESAR II files
  • Corrosion: No corrosion allowance has been considered according to IP specification.
  • Mill tolerance: a mill tolerance of 12.5% has been considered for thickness reduction.
  • Stress concentration regions: FEM model account for stress concentration regions. No out-of-roundness has been considered.
  • Existing damage: No damage has been specified by IP after on-site inspection and measurements.

2. Material characterization:

  • A reliable constitutive model has been formulated to reflect time dependent creep and plastic deformations.
  • Material data has been obtained from experimental data according to NIMS Material Database.
  • Norton model creep equation has been adopted for creep characterization.
  • Third stage of creep (damage stage) is not required for analysis.

3. Assessment Technique:

  • Stress analysis for the creep damage evaluation would be based on solutions obtained from Finite Element Analysis, thus according to API579-1/ASME FFS-1 Assessment Level 2 rules.

4. Assessment Procedures:

  • Evaluation of structural integrity of pipeline components would be based on Creep rupture life. According to stress results from FEM analysis, remaining life and accumulated creep damage for all cycles of operation is determined.

An inelastic analysis is used to evaluate the effect of creep, then a material model is required to compute the creep strains in the component as a fuction of stress, temperature, and accumulated creep strain (strain hardening model). If the computed stresses exceed the yield strength of the material at temperature plasticity should also be included in the material model.

The assesment procedure in this job provides a systematic approach for evaluating the creep damage for each operating cycle. The total creep damage is computed as the sum of the creep damages calculated for each cycle.

Procedure to determine creep damage

In addition to satisfying the previous damage criterion, if the stress components are based on an inelastic analysis that includes plasticity and creep, a limit on the total accumulated ineslastic strains should be set to a value that will not limit the operabiblity of the component. The suggested limit for the accummulated strains are proveded in Annex B1, paragraph B.3.3

Piping Systems by FEM

FEM model in analysis of piping system working at temperatures above creep zone (modelo de elementos finitos FEM)
  • Element type:
  • SHELL282
  • Number of elements: 42264
  • Number of nodes: 126664
  • Element size: 35 mm (global)
  • 15mm (bends and tees)
FEM model in analysis of piping system working above creep range (modelo fem - elementos finitos)

Analysis procedure: According to API579-1/ASME FFS-1 Section 10.5.2: inelastic analisis

Material model: creep strains are computed in the component as a function of stress, temperature, and accumulated creep strain (strain hardening model). If the computed stresses exceed the yield strength of the material at temperature plasticity should also be included in the material model.

The assessment procedure in this job provides a systematic approach for evaluating the creep damage for each operating cycle. The total creep damage is computed as the sum of the creep damages calculated for each cycle

If the stress components are based on an inelastic analysis that includes plasticity and creep, a limit on the total accumulated inelastic strains should be set to a value that will not limit the operability of the component.

Material Characterization

  • Creep properties depending on time and temperature.
  • Creep strain rate. Curve fitting.
    • Creep coeficient  à creep  equation of the material
    • Creep equation model à NORTON (secondary creep)
    • Creep parameters à Curve fitting à Iterative process
    • Utilized parameter are: stress, % elongation, strain, creep strain rate, variables depending on time and temperature.
  • Consideration of plasticity of the material via elasto-plastic  model with hardening.
  • Consideración de plasticidad de material con modelo elasto-plástico con endurecimiento

Conclusions

In the preliminary evaluation of operational condition, operating temperatures (Tª=530ºC) were in creep temperature ranges according to table 4.1 of FFS.

  • For carbon steel (σu < 410MPa)→Tª creep limit= 343ºC
  • For carbon steel (σu < 410MPa)→ Tª creep limit= 371ºC
  • For 9Cr-1Mo-V → Tª creep limit= 454ºC

For these reason, creep damaged could be present after FEM analysis.

Analysis considering material creep properties and plasticity did not converged at 20 hr of cycle, this may indicates that some pipe zones may present creep damage at operating and boundary condition considered on analysis.

Creep analysis is performed considering stresses from linear material behaviour FEM analysis and results indicates that creep damage due to operating and boundary conditions is much higher than the damage limit established in 0.8.

Creep damage= 1.8e14>> 0.8

Results of creep damage evaluation (considering stresses from linear analysis) indicates that creep damage occurs even very low operating hours.

This is in accordance with non-linear analysis results.

Moreover, according to screening criteria tables for level 1 assessment the maximum stresses must be lower than 250 MPa for 25 hrs and  115 for 250000 hrs, maximum stress results from linear analysis are higher than 1000 MPa, so it can be concluded that creep damage will occur at low cycle operation

Further Information

CADE provides engineering, simulation and consulting services aimed to assess critical plant equipment, piping systems and structures when they are not performing as expected, a failure has occurred or their mechanical integrity and remaining life must be evaluated. To request more information about this type of services, please complete the following form: 

Contact CADE Engineered Technologies

For any further information , please complete the following form:

Albacete

Parque Científico y Tecnológico
Paseo de la Innovación 3, 02006 Albacete – España

Tel. +34 967 19 01 72

Factoría CADE

Polg. Ind. Campollano

Av. Adeca, 55, 02007 Albacete

Madrid

C/Raimundo Fernández Villaverde, 53 (Entreplanta) 28020. Madrid – España

Albacete

Parque Científico y Tecnológico

Paseo de la Innovación 3, 02006 Albacete – España

Tel. +34 967 19 01 72

Madrid

C/Raimundo Fernández Villaverde, 53 (Entreplanta)

28020

Madrid – España

Privacy Summary

This website uses cookies so that we can offer you the best possible user experience. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognizing you when you return to our website or helping our team understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.